← All stories
AI-generated editorial illustration: a wide plain of sun-baked earth cracked into pale polygonal plates under a bleached white sky, with a scattering of small green seedlings pushing up through the fissures
An Interactive Visual Journey · Independent Editorial

Nothing here
is dead

The rain arrives, and minutes later it is gone — sideways, downhill, taking the topsoil with it. But under this crust there is a seed bank waiting, and under those grey stumps there are living roots. This is a story about a shovel, and about how much of a landscape is only sleeping. You're going to dig.

An Undertold interactive · Independent editorial · · 8 min read + play
✦ move your cursor — try to hold the water Dig ↓
Chapter One

The runoff problem

Stand on degraded rangeland in southern Kenya at the start of the rains and you will see something that looks like a mistake. Water falls on ground that has been grazed bare and baked hard, and the ground refuses it. Instead of sinking, the rain gathers into sheets, finds the slope, and leaves — carrying the finest, most fertile particles of soil with it.

The land is not short of rain so much as short of time with rain. A downpour that would transform a field somewhere else runs off a sealed surface in minutes. What is left behind is drier than before the storm, because the storm took soil with it on the way out.

This is the problem a Dutch foundation called Justdiggit has been attacking since 2009, with something close to the simplest tool available. Their entire theory is that if you can make the water stop for long enough, everything else the landscape needs is already there, waiting.

Chapter Two

A painter's plumbing

Peter Westerveld was an artist, born in 1951 and raised in Tanzania, and he had the useful habit of looking at a continent the way you'd look at a canvas. What he saw in East Africa's drylands wasn't a shortage of water. It was a plumbing failure — rain arriving, refusing to be absorbed, and exiting the system.

His response was to invent something at a scale artists don't usually work in: contour trenching across whole landscapes, cut along the lines where water naturally slows. He called the routes these formed hydrological corridors. In May 2009 he was introduced to Dennis Karpes, a social entrepreneur and marketer, and together they built an organisation around the idea. They named it the Naga Foundation, after the Sanskrit word for bringers of rain, guardians of water. It was later renamed Justdiggit.

Westerveld died in 2014. Almost all of the scale arrived afterwards.

What he left was a mechanism precise enough that a person with a hand tool could reproduce it, and cheap enough that thousands of people could. It is worth understanding exactly, because the whole argument rests on a shape.

Interactive · Get it backwards and it fails

How a water bund works

A water bund is a shallow crescent-shaped pit, about five metres long and two and a half metres wide — Justdiggit describes one as roughly the size of a small elephant. The excavated soil is banked into a low berm along one edge. A single bund holds around 2,100 litres of water and, the organisation reports, can help regreen about 124 square metres of ground.

Which edge the berm goes on is not a detail. It is the entire device. Rotate the bund below and run the rain: with the closed side facing downhill, water arriving from up the slope is stopped and pooled. Turn it the other way and the same rain walks straight through the open mouth and carries on.

SIM 01 · ONE BUND, ONE SLOPE● BERM ORIENTATION: CHECK

Summary of this interactive: water flows down a slope from the top of the frame to the bottom. A crescent-shaped bund sits in its path. When the closed, banked side of the crescent faces downhill, arriving water is trapped in the pit and soaks into the soil. When the crescent is rotated so the berm faces uphill, water enters around it and passes through, and the capture rate falls to near zero. Use the orientation slider below to rotate the bund; the percentage captured is reported in the readouts.

0litres held
0litres lost
of water reaching it
Illustrative, not to scale. Counters track only the water that arrives at this bund, not everything crossing the slope. Real siting depends on slope, soil type and spacing; bunds are set out along the contour, not individually aimed.
Cross-section of a water bund on a slope A slope descends from left to right. A shallow pit is cut into it, and the excavated soil forms a raised berm on the downhill edge. Water arriving from uphill pools in the pit and infiltrates downward into the soil. runoff from uphill pit berm (downhill) water enters the soil profile ≈ 5 m across
Anatomy of a water bund, in section. Diagram drawn to describe the mechanism, not surveyed — proportions are indicative. Dimensions and capacity as published by Justdiggit.
Advertisement
AD SLOT · paste network embed here
Chapter Three

Scaling simplicity

One bund holds a bathtub and a half of water. That is not a climate intervention. What makes it one is repetition: Justdiggit reports more than 800,000 bunds dug across its project sites in Kenya and Tanzania, alongside 260 kilometres of Fanya Juu and Fanya Chini trenches. The communities dig them themselves — which the organisation frames as the point rather than a cost saving, because a bund nobody feels ownership of is a bund nobody maintains.

Below is a hillside of roughly one hectare. Right now it sheds most of what falls on it. Tap the slope to dig, choose a rainfall year, then run six months and watch what the ground does. Switch to thermal view to see the thing that is hardest to believe until you measure it: green ground is cooler ground.

Two of the controls are there to keep you honest. Drought is one. The other is livestock: regrowth that isn't protected from grazing gets eaten, and no amount of digging fixes that.

SIM 02 · ONE HECTARE · SOUTH RIFT SLOPE● 0 BUNDS · MONTH 0

Summary of this interactive: a hillside sheds most rainfall as runoff because the soil surface is crusted. Digging crescent-shaped bunds captures that runoff — each holds about 2,100 litres per filling — and the stored water lets grass establish. As vegetation cover increases, less of the next rainfall runs off, so the effect compounds. Two controls limit it: a drought year supplies far less water to capture, and heavy livestock grazing removes regrowth before it establishes. A thermal view shows the cooler surface temperature over regreened ground. Use the buttons below to dig twenty bunds at a time, set rainfall and grazing pressure, and run a six-month season; results are reported in the readouts.

0bunds dug
0litres held
0m² regreened
0.00 °Csurface cooling
Illustrative, not to scale, and not a hydrological model. Water capture is simplified; the cooling readout is scaled to a measured field result — loggers in Amboseli recorded mean temperature 2.36 °C higher outside bunds than inside over Feb–Jul 2022, a preliminary finding whose authors call for longer time series.
Interactive · Live

At last year's reported rate, the bunds have held, since you opened this page

0
litres of water in the soil

Justdiggit reports 10.5 billion litres retained across its sites in 2025. Spread evenly, that is about 333 litres every second, all year — the counter above is simply that arithmetic, not a live feed. Alongside it the organisation reports 525,000 hectares under restoration and 32.3 million trees recovered.

Both of those last two numbers deserve an asterisk, and they get one further down. But the water figure points at something real, and something the satellites can see. Since 2022 the organisation has worked with Planet Labs, using three-metre resolution imagery plus soil-water and land-surface-temperature data feeds; a joint project with the European Space Agency and the University of Leicester, Restore-IT, exists specifically to work out how accurately restoration can be verified from orbit.

Advertisement
AD SLOT · paste network embed here
Chapter Four

Dormant life

Here is the part that changes how the landscape looks once you know it. Scattered across farmland all over the region are grey, cut stumps — the remains of trees taken for charcoal, timber and clearance, sometimes decades ago. They read as evidence of loss. Many of them are alive.

A felled tree with an intact root system doesn't necessarily die. It sends up shoots, which get cut, grazed or burned, and it sends up more. In Swahili the technique for working with this is called Kisiki Hai — living stump. You don't plant anything. You choose a stump, protect it, and prune the shoots so the root system's energy goes into a few strong stems instead of thirty weak ones.

A single stump can throw between 10 and 30 stems in a year. Managed this way, survival exceeds 80% — far better than planted seedlings, which need a nursery, transport, watering and luck. Since 2017, Justdiggit and the LEAD Foundation have run this at scale in Tanzania under the name Treecovery; farmers there have brought back more than 17.5 million trees.

The technique is not theirs and not new. In Niger, farmer-managed natural regeneration restored roughly five million hectares and some 200 million trees, adding an estimated $900 million a year to the country's agricultural output — at a cost measured in tens of dollars per hectare, most of which is the farmer's own labour.

Interactive · Choose what lives

Prune a stump

This stump has thrown a season's worth of shoots. Every one of them is drawing on the same roots. Click a stem to cut it — or use the arrow keys and Enter. Leave too many and the stump spends everything on thin, crowded growth. Leave too few and you have wasted a year of root power. The farmers doing this are aiming for a handful.

SIM 03 · KISIKI HAI · ONE STUMP● 14 STEMS — TOO CROWDED

Summary of this interactive: a cut stump with a living root system has sent up fourteen shoots. All of them draw on the same roots, so all of them stay thin. Cutting the weaker shoots concentrates the root system's energy into the remainder. Leaving roughly three to five stems produces strong growth; leaving more produces crowded, spindly stems; leaving one or two wastes the stump's capacity. Keyboard: focus this panel, use the left and right arrow keys to select a stem and Enter or Space to cut it. The number of stems kept and the resulting vigour are reported below.

14stems kept
Lowgrowth per stem
Illustrative, not to scale. Real pruning is species-specific and repeated over several seasons; the stem counts here are a simplification of published guidance for the technique.
Chapter Five

Grass banks and grazing rules

A bund is a hole. Anyone can make one in an afternoon. The reason regreening projects fail is almost never that the hole was dug wrong — it is that nothing protected what grew in it, or nobody had a reason to come back next year.

So a surprising share of the actual machinery here is agreement. In Kenya, regrowth is protected inside olopololi — grassland enclosures kept closed to livestock so that grass can set seed before it is grazed. That is a decision a community makes about its own animals, and it costs something in the short term.

The clearest example is the grass seed banks. Small parcels of communal land are given over to growing grass for seed, and they are managed by Maasai women's groups who are trained in sowing, weeding and harvesting. The seed is sold on local markets or on to other restoration sites. Justdiggit reports 43 seed banks involving 879 women — an income stream that exists because the grass is worth more standing than grazed.

0grass seed banks
0women involved
0trees via Treecovery

Read the intervention that way and the shovel stops being the invention. The invention is a reason to leave the grass alone.

Chapter Six

The honest ledger

Justdiggit is a Dutch foundation with public-benefit (ANBI) status since 2010 and recognition from the CBF, the Netherlands' charity regulator — which requires independent assessment of governance, fundraising and reporting. The regulator's published figures for 2024 show €6.52 million raised against €7.00 million spent, of which €5.44 million — a little over 77% — went directly to the objective. It spent more than it raised that year, drawing on reserves of €4.32 million. The mechanism it uses has decades of evidence behind it. None of that makes every claim on its website equally solid, and four are worth holding up to the light.

Savannas are not broken forests

A 2024 study in Science found that 70.1 million hectares — 52.5% of the area pledged under Africa's AFR100 restoration initiative — targets grassy ecosystems that were never forest. Adding tree cover there can displace shade-intolerant plants and harm grazing wildlife. Justdiggit works squarely in rangelands. Its partial defence is real: it regrows indigenous trees from existing roots and restores grass rather than planting exotic plantations. The critique still applies to anyone carrying a hectare target across a savanna.

The rainfall claim outruns the evidence

Justdiggit's own FAQ states that regreening stimulates the water cycle, "causing increased rainfall". Whether local revegetation actually increases rainfall is genuinely contested: it depends on scale and on how much moisture the atmosphere is carrying, and in dry air extra transpiration can reduce moisture convergence rather than add to it. The cooling and soil-moisture effects are measured. The rain-making is not.

"Under restoration" is not "restored"

The headline is 525,000 hectares under restoration — a pipeline figure, not an outcome, and the organisation's own FAQ concedes it is hard to say how many square metres a given donation regreens. But this is also where Justdiggit comes off better than most. When the World Resources Institute independently checked one of its projects, running an AI tree-detection model over satellite imagery from March 2022 to August 2024, it counted 145,354 newly grown trees against Justdiggit's claim of 167,500 — 87% of the reported figure, and more than double the project's original target. An over-count, and a modest one. WRI's own caveats matter: only 331 of a targeted 1,600 hectares were submitted, usable imagery existed for 40 of 113 mapped areas, and the rest is extrapolation. No comparable check exists for the 32.3 million trees claimed across all sites.

Digging is the easy part

Earth bunds, unlike stone ones, generally need maintenance every year. Their effectiveness depends on slope, soil type and spacing, and works best when neighbouring landholders act together. Regrowth has to be protected from grazing, which requires functioning community agreements. And research consistently finds restoration fails where land tenure and tree ownership are undefined. The binding constraint is social, not hydrological — as the simulation's grazing slider is there to make unavoidable.

What survives all four objections is the core observation, and it is a good one. On crusted ground, the difference between water that leaves in minutes and water that stays long enough to be used is a shape you can cut with a hand tool. The seeds are already in the soil. The roots are already under the stumps. Most of the landscape is not gone — it is waiting, and it is cheaper to wake than to rebuild.

If this story moved you

You dug a hillside.
The real ones are dug by hand.

This is independent editorial content — we are not affiliated with Justdiggit and receive nothing from the link below. If you'd like to support the work described, you can give directly.